Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:27

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Pope Leo XIV Dons White Sox Hat During Public General Audience in Vatican - Sports Illustrated
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Manny Machado, pitching power Padres to series win over Brewers - San Diego Union-Tribune
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Apple’s struggles to update Siri lead to investor concerns over AI strategy - Financial Times
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
PoGO This Week (June 2-8): G-Max Rillaboom, Groudon Raids & GO Fest JC - Pokémon GO Hub
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Stopping alcoholism gets smarter with smartwatches - The Brighter Side of News